ShareThis Page

Watershed group will host Marcellus stewardship session

| Wednesday, May 30, 2012, 9:33 p.m.

The Mountain Watershed Association, based out of the Indian Creek Watershed in Westmoreland and Fayette counties, will host a visual assessment training session through the Marcellus Citizen Stewardship Project from 6 to 9 p.m. Thursday in the Worthington-West Franklin Community Library.

It's the first time the community organization will offer the training in Armstrong County.

"While the Department of Environmental Protection has increased inspection and enforcement, it's impossible for their inspectors to be everywhere at once," said Veronica Coptis, the association's community organizer. "Citizens can play a very important role in monitoring Marcellus development, and our training gives them the tools necessary to safely and effectively provide oversight."

Participants in the session will learn to see, hear and smell potential issues stemming from local drilling operations without any equipment. They'll be briefed on permits, regulations and how to file a drilling complaint.

"Citizens should engage in monitoring Marcellus activity to have a better understanding of what is occurring in their community," Coptis said. "It will offer more protection to the community as volunteers can alert the proper agency to any impacts to their neighborhood that may have otherwise gone unnoticed."

Wheeling Jesuit University biology professor Ben Stout will be in the library beginning at 5 p.m. to go over any pre-drill water test results. Although water testing will not be done on-site, Stout will interpret the results of previous tests for residents who have had their water examined at a certified lab.

"By attending the training, each person will be able to be another set of eyes and ears for the DEP," Coptis said.

For more information, visit mtwatershed.com .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.