Share This Page

Apollo officials mum on police chief's suspension

| Friday, June 15, 2012, 8:39 p.m.
File photo
Former Apollo police chief Paul Breznican.

Apollo police Chief Paul Breznican, who has been on leave collecting workers' compensation, has been suspended -- but nobody is saying why.

"I have learned that he was suspended," his attorney, Greg Swank, said on Friday. "They didn't give a reason why he's been suspended."

Swank said he got an email from Mayor Rich Dixon around midday Thursday stating that Breznican was suspended, with pay, effective immediately. Breznican is paid about $33,000 annually.

Breznican did not return calls. Dixon referred questions to borough Solicitor Chuck Pascal, who would not comment on "personnel action."

Council President David Heffernan said the suspension was agreed to by all council members.

Heffernan said "there are too many things still unclear and still ongoing" for him to say more.

Breznican, who is the only full-time officer in the Armstrong County community, has been on the borough's police force for 13 years. He was named chief in 2006, when he replaced retired Chief Robin Davis.

Breznican has not been working for about a year because of an injury he suffered on the job.

"From a practical standpoint, he's been suspended from a job he currently doesn't fill," Swank said. "That doesn't make sense to me. I don't know what they're trying to accomplish with that, other than more public humiliation tactics going on among all these people."

Swank said Dixon's email indicated that council plans to review the matter during its June 28 meeting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.