Braddock man pleads to contact with teens
KITTANNING – A 35-year-old Braddock man who was arrested in May for arranging online to meet with two 14-year-old girls in Boggs pleaded guilty on Friday to a felony charge stemming from that case.
Joshua B. Patterson pleaded guilty before Judge James Panchik to a charge of corruption of minors.
He also is facing charges from that incident of statutory sexual assault, unlawful contact with a minor (sexual offenses) and criminal use of a communication facility – all felonies.
According to a police report, Patterson first made contact with the girls in March on the social networking site myYearbook.com, posing as a 19-year-old and going by the name Joshua Phillips. The Leader Times does not reveal the names of minors who are the victims of a crime.
Patterson chatted with his victims on Skype, before making plans to meet them at a location along Ridge Road on May 4.
The girls got nervous when they realized Patterson appeared much older than 19. He reportedly put his arms around one of the girls, rubbing his chin on her neck. When she tried to break free, he continued to hold her until the other girl managed to pull her away. As the girls walked away from Patterson, he grabbed one by her hoodie and pulled her to him. The girls became combative and Patterson got back in his car and drove away.
During an interview with state police on May 7, Patterson confessed to the incident.
Police served a search warrant and seized Patterson's cellphone and computer. He was placed in the Armstrong County Jail in lieu of $75,000 bond. According to jail records, he was released on May 15 on his own recognizance.
He is awaiting sentencing.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.