Armstrong drug squad nabs alleged dealer
EAST FRANKLIN — Robert Dale “Whitey” Damore, 47, of New Kensington was arrested Sunday at Franklin Village Mall by members of the Armstrong County Narcotics Enforcement Team.
District Attorney Scott Andreassi said Damore, described by police as a “high-level cocaine dealer,” was charged with possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, delivery of a controlled substance and criminal use of a communication facility.
According to Detective Frank Pitzer, Damore has been in the sights of law enforcement for several years regarding his alleged drug activities in Armstrong, Allegheny, Clarion and Westmoreland counties. Pitzer said it was difficult for law enforcement officials to infiltrate Damore's close contacts. However, he said the arrest was made possible because of close cooperation between ArmNET, the Clarion County narcotics unit and the New Bethlehem police department. Andreassi added that without the cooperation between law enforcement agencies in Armstrong and surrounding counties, arrests of this type would be difficult if not impossible.
ArmNET agents were assisted by the Armstrong County Sheriff's Department, and police departments from Ford City, Kiski Township and Kittanning, and the Kittanning EMS staff. Damore was committed to the Armstrong County Jail in lieu of $100,000 bond. Andreassi's office said no additional arrests are expected.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.