Solar power ignites Lenape students' interests
MANOR — Some area elementary students learned on Tuesday how to unleash the power of the sun and discovered that science also can unleash a whole lot of fun.
Throughout much of the afternoon, fourth-graders at Lenape Elementary School learned about the advantages of solar power in the production of electricity.
The hands-on lesson was part of a Pennsylvania State University sponsored program called Green Environmental Challenger for Kids Outreach (GECKO).
Program coordinator Debbie Novak and PSU students Emily Bolewitz and Diamond Barnett talked to students about renewable and nonrenewable power sources and provided students with parts to assemble solar-powered toy cars.
Novak asked students in Sue Girardi's classroom why solar power is considered a renewable source.
About a dozen hands shot up.
“Because the sun lasts and lasts and lasts,” said student Layne Balla.
In Girardi's classroom, four teams of students worked together assembling and demonstrating how to make their car move across the floor using a light source.
Principal Tom Dinga and Assistant Principal Paula Kijowski stopped by as each team tested their car's ability.
Layne took a turn aiming the flashlight's beam over the car and stretched his arm to keep pace as the vehicle zipped past a yardstick.
The rest of his team cheered.
As the demonstration wrapped up, several students asked if they could do more experiments.
Girardi noted that the hands-on lesson demonstrates environmental awareness and correlates with state standards.
She also pointed out how much fun science can be for kids.
“Science is exciting,” she said.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.