Armstrong School District pulls leasing school to Adelphoi Village
Elderton Junior-Senior High School will remain empty, at least a little longer.
Armstrong School District solicitor Lee Price said at the beginning of Monday's school board meeting that the directors had decided to pull a controversial resolution to lease portions of the building to the Adelphoi Village alternative education program.
The board announced the one-year, $90,000 lease proposal during its open caucus last week.
“After further review of the lease terms and conditions, there is insufficient support to even have it on the agenda any longer,” said Price. “That matter is being pulled completely.”
Price's statement was met with scattered applause from a large group of residents who turned out to oppose the lease, but he stressed the decision should not reflect poorly on Adelphoi Village.
“That's not to imply that the district doesn't believe Adelphoi operates a good alternative education program,” he said. “In fact, most of the kids in the program are our students. But (the board directors) just don't feel that it would be appropriate to have that at the location out in the Elderton area.”
Adelphoi Village is a not-for-profit child care agency based out of Latrobe that works with children who are struggling to overcome social, emotional and behavioral difficulties. Many of the opponents expressed concern about the fact that Elderton Elementary School still operates in another part of the high school building, and Price said that may have been a factor in the district's decision.
“Although there's a separation of the building internally, they just didn't feel comfortable with it at this point in time,” he said after the meeting. “Money was not the only factor.”
However, there were other residents present who opposed the Adelphoi lease for another reason. The proposed Everlasting Elderton Charter School has expressed interest in renting the facilities from ASD if the charter is approved.
Amanda Bartosiewicz, a member of Everlasting Elderton's founding board, said although the charter application submitted last month listed Towne Hall along Route 422 as a possible location for the school, the high school would be preferable.
She said ASD has ignored the charter school's request to rent the space.
“We have sent several communications to the administration asking to open communication about leasing a portion of the Elderton High School building,” she said.
“When you're filling out an application to open a charter school, you must have a letter of intent (from a location) to even submit an application. When we contacted the administration, it would not give us a letter of intent to lease. Although the Towne Hall is a beautiful building, it is not our first consideration. Our first consideration is the Elderton High School building.”
Bartosiewicz also said that Everlasting Elderton has budgeted more to rent the building than the $90,000 proposed by Adelphoi. However, the charter still
must be approved or denied by the ASD board which has until March 12 to announce its decision. In the event the charter is denied, Everlasting Elderton can appeal to the state if it collects the signatures of 1,000 residents or 2 percent of the district.
If the charter is approved, ASD projects the district would have to pay approximately $2 million more towards charter schools in its annual budget than it would if it's denied.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kittanning razes condemned homes it bought at tax sale
- Support group in Ford City offers help to depressed