Sting operation nets crack cocaine suspect in Ford City
A Kittanning man authorities describe as a high level crack cocaine dealer was arrested on Monday afternoon during a sting operation in Ford City.
According to a report released by the Armstrong County District Attorney's office, Jeremy M. Carr, 23, had been “in the sights” of law enforcement for several weeks for selling crack in the Kittanning and Ford City areas.
Armstrong County Narcotics Enforcement Team (ArmNET) agents apprehended Carr after a confidential informant arranged to purchase 1.4 grams of cocaine from him at about 2:15 p.m. on Monday along Seventh Avenue in Ford City.
ArmNET coordinator Frank Pitzer said agents stepped in after the exchange and arrested Carr outside a nearby residence.
“Carr was apprehended with several hundred dollars in his possession along with the funds that were provided to (him) by a confidential informant for the purchase of crack cocaine,” said Pitzer.
Carr was taken to a holding cell at the Kittanning Police Station then placed in Armstrong County Jail by District Judge James Owen in lieu of $35,000 bond on charges of possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, delivery of a controlled substance and criminal use of a communications facility.
The Armstrong County District Attorney's Office expects additional arrests and seizures in the investigation which is being conducted by ArmNET with cooperation from the Armstrong County Sheriff's Department and Ford City, Kittanning and Freeport police.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach: email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.