Rosebud makes way for parking in Kittanning
By Brigid Beatty
Published: Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
KITTANNING — A pile of rubble and a gaping space in the row of buildings on the south side of the 300 block of Market Street is all that remains of the building that once housed a flower shop.
And that is not the only building slated to come down along that section of the county seat's main street.
According to Ken Opalka, assistant land manager with Rosebud Mining Co., the building next door, which formerly housed the Columbia Theater is ready for demolition.
“The buildings were in pretty bad shape,” Opalka said.
He said the space will be used for employee parking and anticipates work to begin this summer after the ground settles.
Rosebud also purchased the two Market Square Sgro buildings, Opalka said.
Razing those buildings are pending an asbestos survey and removal, he said, adding that there are no immediate plans for the site.
Turney Luke, who has owned the 700 Shop at 117 Market St., for the past 30 years, said Rosebud has had a positive impact on the town.
“They've done a wonderful job remodeling the old Thompson Building on the corner (of Market and North McKean Street) where the drug store used to be,” said Luke, adding that Rosebud probably spent more money remodeling than it would have if it tore down the building.
Luke said he remembered Bauers Flowers and recalled how busy it had been.
But, he said, even though people have memories of stores in town, things can't stay the same.
People move on, move away or retire.
“I hate to see buildings go,” Luke said.
“But if (Rosebud) has a plan to make improvements, that's a good thing for the town.”
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kittanning vigil planned for mother in fatal collision
- County board seeks members
- District weighs AP test charges
- West Kittanning holds line on taxes
- Ford City’s A Mano features cuisine ‘by hand’
- Rayburn animal shelter in desperate need of new wheels