NuMine man jailed in underage sex-assault case
COWANSHANNOCK — A NuMine man was placed in Armstrong County Jail for allegedly having sex with a 14-year-old girl.
Jeremy Johnston, 20, is accused of engaging in intercourse with the girl about two weeks ago and having inappropriate sexual contact with her during several instances before that.
The Leader Times does not identify juveniles who are victims of crimes.
According to court documents, the girl was at the NuMine home of Johnston's 13-year-old cousin during a weekend in mid-February. The girl said she was lying down in an upstairs bedroom when Johnston came into the room and began touching her. Although the girl claimed to repeatedly push Johnston away, she said he removed her clothes and proceeded to have sex with her.
The girl also said Johnston touched her inappropriately on four other occasions within the last several months.
The girl's mother reportedly learned about the sexual relationship when she read a message her daughter sent to a friend on Facebook. Police were notified on Feb. 24.
Later that day, Johnston — who said he believed the girl was 17 or 18 years old — admitted to a state trooper that he engaged in intercourse with the victim but claimed it took place at a rock pile near the home. He also admitted to having sexual contact with the girl on about three prior occasions.
Johnston was arrested and placed in Armstrong County Jail by District Judge Gary DeComo on charges of statutory sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault on a person under 16, indecent assault on a person under 16 and corruption of minors. Bail was set at $25,000.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.