ShareThis Page

Wayne residents seek solution to road woes

| Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 12:51 a.m.
Bill Shirley
Denny Crissman a resident of Underpass road in Wayne Township is upset about the condition of the township roads, specifically Underpass Road and points a finger at Township Supervisors Dale Brockoff, Terry Rupp and C. Ross Grooms at the monthly meeting held at the Old Wayne Township Election house, Monday, March 4, 2013. Bill Shirley | For The Leader Times

WAYNE — Residents frustrated with the poor condition of their township road are a step closer to getting their issue resolved after bringing their complaints to the township supervisors during a public meeting on Monday night.

Donna Crissman and Michele Kowalski-Stanton both live in homes along Underpass Road.

At issue is their battle with icy road surfaces, potholes and concerns that the deteriorated culvert along the road poses a serious hazard to all of the residents living along Underpass.

They claim their road has been neglected by the township supervisors and employees.

Crissman asked why Underpass was overlooked by the township when it came to clearing snow and treating the surface with ash and anti-skid material.

“Who in this township decides on what roads are taken care of?” asked Crissman.

Kowalski-Stanton said her father and son have disabilities and both have fallen on the road. She told the supervisors she is concerned about their safety and about the family's inability to exit the untreated road for medical appointments during snowy conditions.

Crissman pointed out that other township roads also are in need of repair.

Supervisor C. Ross Grooms wanted to know why Crissman hadn't notified him before.

“We're doing the best we can,” said Grooms. “You never contacted me this year to tell me you had a problem.”

Grooms and supervisors Dale Brockhoff and Terry Rupp contend that Underpass Road lacks adequate room for township vehicles to safely turn around without endangering the drivers and risking damage to the residents' property.

They also claim their previous attempts at working out a solution with residents — such as putting in a turn around at the end of the road — were met with resistance last fall.

According to Rupp, Crissman's husband, Denny, was uncooperative in November when township employees showed up to make the turn around.

Denny Crissman had been present for a time at the meeting but left early.

“We're not going to send a crew down there to have someone antagonize them,” said Rupp.

Donna Crissman said she had not been aware of her husband's reaction to the work crews and said she would welcome the supervisors back to look at turn-around options.

Rupp was hesitant at first to discuss the matter because of the possibility of pending legal action brought against the township by Crissman and Kowalski-Stanton.

However, the women said that they had only contacted attorneys to get advice and would not be taking legal action.

Rupp noted that they have filled in some potholes, including ones on Underpass, but the work can't be done when the ground is frozen.

Some of the roads need the base to be rebuilt with larger stone before covering with smaller limestone, said Grooms.

“It takes time. You cannot fix 70 miles of road on the budget we have this year,” said Grooms. “We don't have enough funds or ashes available to paint every road black.”

The supervisors encouraged Crissman and Kowalski-Stanton to keep them informed.

“I don't see why we can't find common ground,” said Rupp.

Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.