Freeport man waives right to hearing in robbery case
FORD CITY – A 32-year-old Freeport man, who police say was thwarted by a clerk as he allegedly tried to rob a convenience store in February, is headed for Armstrong County Criminal Court.
Joshua Paul Lang, of 115 Fourth St., Apt. 8, Freeport, waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Tuesday before District Judge J. Gary DeComo.
Lang is charged with attempted robbery, attempted theft, simple assault and harassment.
According to the criminal complaint, Lang entered the Freeport BP convenience store at 222 Buffalo St., at around 8:15 a.m. Feb. 26 and rushed behind the counter, shoving the clerk, Michelle Suzanne Hawthorne, away from the cash register.
After struggling with Hawthorne and failing to gain access to the cash register, Lang fled on foot.
He was apprehended along Market Street in Freeport a short time later and confessed to the robbery saying “he wanted to go back to jail,” the complaint said.
Hawthorne, who appeared in district court on Tuesday, said Lang had come into the store a couple of times before Feb. 26 to buy lottery tickets.
Hawthorne said Lang injured her neck and back when he shoved her into the counter during his attempted robbery.
“He told everybody he's on heroin and wants to go back to jail to get methadone,” said Hawthorne.
Lang has been held in the Armstrong County Jail since Feb. 26 in lieu of $50,000 cash bond.
Court records show Lang has been jailed in Armstrong County for similar crimes and has received drug treatment at ARC Manor in Kittanning.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.