Kittanning argues over next police chief
KITTANNING — An attempt by council to hire a new borough police chief on Monday seemed more like an April Fools' Day joke since it is still unclear who is filling the position vacated by retiring Chief Ed Cassesse.
Councilwoman Kim Fox made the motion to nominate Kittanning police officer Bruce Matthews for the position of chief of police.
The vote passed with a 5-3 majority with council President Chris Schiano, councilman Mike Rosenberger, councilwomen Betsy Wilt and Joie Pryde voting yes and councilmen Richard Reedy, Ange Turco and Andrew Peters voting no.
Reedy argued that he thought the purpose of Monday's vote was to nominate people for the position and said he had someone, other than Matthews, whom he wanted to nominate for chief.
He said it was unclear to him that the issue put to vote was to appoint a new chief that night and said he had not attended the interviews for candidates in the last couple of weeks because of poor health.
Fox said she could reword the motion to appoint Matthews for the position of chief.
However, Turco moved to table the decision until the solicitor was present.
Borough solicitor Chase McClister was absent from the meeting.
Peters agreed with Turco and also moved to table the decision.
“I knew this would happen,” said Schiano, adding that council would call a special meeting as soon as McClister was able to attend.
Mayor Kirk Atwood said in the interim, he would appoint Kittanning police officer Pete Harmon to the position of officer in charge.
Schiano told Atwood that the appointed position would only be until the vote at the special meeting determined who the new chief would be.
“The motion Kim made is off the books,” Schiano said to Betty Thompson, the borough secretary.
Even so, Reedy and Schiano continued to argue over the issue.
“We voted for a chief tonight,”said Schiano. “We can have our solicitor say what we did or did not do.”
Schiano said after the meeting that council had interviewed about 14 candidates for the chief position.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.