ShareThis Page

Lenape students take 1st at Envirothon

| Thursday, May 2, 2013, 7:36 p.m.
The Lenape Technical School Envirothon team. 'Warriors ' took first place in the 2013 Envirothon Wednesday at the Enviromental Learning Center, Crooked Creek Park. From left are natural resources technology instructor Steve Misera and students Tyler Elkin, Ricky Bierer, Liam Doms, Tyler Peters, and Zach MIlller. Event organizer Jessica Schaub of the Armstrong County Conservation Department is at right. TOM MITCHELL I FOR THE LEADER TIMES
Pennsylvania Game Commission wildlife conservation officers Rodney L. Burns, left, and Gary Toward, right, play sounds of birds and animals for Kittanning High School students to identify as part of the 2013 Envirothon at the Crooked Creek Parks Enviromental Learning Center on Wednesday. TOM MITCHELLI FOR THE LEADER TIMES

BETHEL – Several months of study and preparation paid off big this week for five Lenape Technical School natural resources technology students during the 2013 Envirothon at Crooked Creek Lake's Environmental Learning Center.

The Lenape team, “Warriors” came in first place by a wide margin while competing with a dozen teams from seven area high schools.

As a result, the team will represent Armstrong County in a statewide competition to be held at Juniata College on May 21 and 22. Wednesday's competition tested students' knowledge in areas such as wildlife, forestry, soil and land use, aquatics and the 2013 issue — grazing lands and pasture management.

Event organizer, Jessica Schaub, agricultural technician with the Armstrong County Conservation District, said the overall goal is to get students interested in environmental topics, the outdoors and wildlife. She said many students participating in the event often go into environmental careers.

Schaub has fond memories of her participation in an Envirothon in 1994 while attending Karns City High School, which eventually led to her career in agriculture.

Schaub said students from area high schools were given study packets in January with written guides and computer CDs to prepare for the event.

The studies covered things such as tree identification by bark and leaves and timber use, animal and bird calls and tracks, soil types, aquatic life forms and their relation to water quality and the general environment.

A new theme this year was “Current Issue,” how livestock farmers can use pasture, grazing lands and associated crops to the best advantage.

Envirothon students visited about a dozen different stations where they viewed exhibits and demonstrations and were then given a written test. They had 30 minutes to complete the tests.

Steve Misera, instructor for Lenape's Natural Resources Technology class, said that last year his five-member winning team came in third place.

“The students put a lot of effort into studying for this year's event,” Misera said, “and honestly, I knew they would do well but I was surprised that they took first place by such a wide margin, scoring 288 out of a possible 300 points. We're ready for the state competition at Juniata College in a few weeks.”

He added that if his team should take first place at Juniata. it will go to a national competition at a date and place to be determined.

The winning team was made up of three seniors who competed last year, Tyler Elkin, Ricky Bierer, and Tyler Peters. Two juniors also were part of the team, Liam Doms and Zach Miller. The team was awarded a first-place plaque and each member received a wildlife patch from the Pennsylvania Game Commission and a field guide book of their choice.

Kittanning High School team, “Chiasmata,” took second-place honors and West Shamokin's “Wolves 2” came in third and both teams also received plaques.

Schaub said the event was a lot of fun for all involved but also an invaluable learning experience and she hopes it may lead to exciting careers for the students.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.