Kittanning man treated following fight
KITTANNING — A 40-year-old Kittanning man is suffering from a broken nose, fractured eye socket and multiple stitches after as he told police, he was attacked by a man he did not know while walking in the borough early Monday morning.
The victim, who spoke on condition that he not be named for fear of reprisals, said the incident happened while he and a female companion were walking north past the Post Office on North McKean Street at around 1 a.m.
According to the victim, the assailant approached him saying: “I want to fight you.”
The victim said he started to turn away when he heard the comment but was attacked.
Kittanning Police Chief Bruce Matthews said the department received a report of a fight involving two males at around 1:15 a.m.
By the time the officers arrived at the scene, the assailant had fled and the victim was bleeding from the nose, said Matthews.
The victim, who initially refused medical treatment, agreed to be transported by ambulance to ACMH Hospital when he couldn't stop his nose from bleeding.
Matthews said the assailant was described as being about 5 feet, 7 inches tall, with a stocky build and a shaved head and wearing gray shirt and shorts.
The victim, who had trouble speaking because of his injuries, said he had to go on short term disability because his job specifies he can't work while having open wounds on his body.
Matthews said anyone with information is asked to call Kittanning Borough Police at 724-543-1538.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.