Group hopes to have locks open for recreational boaters in 2014
EAST FRANKLIN — Recreational boaters will have the opportunity during four days in August to pass through Allegheny River locks 6 at Clinton and 7 at Kittanning, which will be operated for several hours by the Army Corps of Engineers.
However, the Allegheny River Development Corp. (ARDC) is seeking ways to bring back seasonal operating hours at all four locks in Armstrong County.
It's unlikely it will be any time soon.
ARDC has its sights on next year and is working toward expanding operating hours from May until September of 2014.
Before that can happen the nonprofit will have to navigate through government channels.
ARDC officers and board of directors held a public meeting on Wednesday at the East Franklin fire hall to lay out the results of recent discussions with the Corps.
Earlier this year, after ARDC had discussed the possibility for a public/private partnership to keep the locks open, the Corps told the organization it would have to be insured for third-party loss for around $5 million.
Since then ARDC officers had been seeking maritime insurers but could find no agency willing to underwrite them.
“So it's off the table,” said Mark Devinney, ARDC president.
Now the group is taking a different tack and is looking into something called contributing funds.
That means the nonprofit would raise money for the Corps to operate the locks at an hourly rate of $60.94, not including maintenance costs.
According to Mike Ferris, ARDC vice president, it would take 470 man-hours per lock to operate from May to September, which works out to $28,000 to operate one lock during the recreational season.
“That's $115,000 to contribute to the Corps and we'd have all four locks open for the recreational season,” said Ferris.
“Considering the other way (of insuring ARDC for $5 million) this is very inexpensive.”
He noted that amount was an estimate and would provide funding for only one season.
Linda Hemmes, ARDC treasurer, said the contributing funds must go through a municipality before it passes to the Corps.
She said ARDC approached the Armstrong County Commissioners in April and asked if they would be the pass between the ARDC and the Corps.
“They are on board with the concept but still need to hammer out the details,” she said after the meeting.
Hemmes said giving money to the federal government for a project like this one will take time to move through the channels.
Approval must go through all the various levels of the Corps before going to the Secretary of the Army and then on to the Office of Management and Budget before filtering back down.
“It's not going to be a short trip,” said Hemmes. “But I'm hopeful it could be next year.”
Although the contributing fund has not been set up yet, a member of the public suggested ARDC begin taking pledges now so the funds would be available when needed.
According to Ferris, there are about 5,000 recreational boaters on the Allegheny River each season.
At present, ARDC has $15,093 of donated money in a fund, said Hemmes. Incoming funds so far have paid maritime attorney fees and have helped with mailing costs.
Devinney encouraged more individuals and businesses to show support for ARDC by signing up for membership and writing to U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly and U.S. Sens.Pat Toomey and Bob Casey.
He thanked Kelly's Director of Outreach Samuel Breene for attending and for supporting ARDC.
“We haven't given up,” Devinney said before the meeting ended. “We still have our shoulder to the wheel.”
Locks 6 and 7 will be open Aug. 3 and 4 from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and on Aug. 10 and 11 from 1:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
For more information visit www.AlleghenyRiverDevelopment.org.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.