Suspect cites heroin addiction in Perry Township gun thefts
Police arrested a Chicora man suspected of stealing an AK-47 assault rifle and another rifle from a Perry Township home on two occasions after a search led them to Frogtown at about 10 p.m. on Sunday.
Braden Richard Texter, 22, of 232 Turner Road, Chicora, told state police he entered the home of Kenneth Bailey along Sycamore Road once around late March and again on Saturday and stole the guns to “feed his addiction” to heroin, according to the police affidavit.
Authorities say that Texter entered Bailey's home sometime around March 25 and stole a Remington 7600 rifle that he reportedly sold to Logan's Gun Gallery in North Washington on April 1. Bailey said he later found the gun at the store and learned that Texter had sold it.
The criminal complaint alleges that Texter returned to Bailey's home around 7 p.m. Saturday and entered through an unlocked basement door before stealing a Romanian AK-47 and two 30-round magazines of ammunition. Bailey noticed the gun was missing when he returned home around 12:30 a.m. Sunday and called police.
A search for Texter began Sunday morning and ended at about 10 p.m. when he was located in Frogtown. He was placed in Armstrong County Jail by District Judge Samuel Goldstrohm on charges of burglary and receiving stolen property and two counts of theft by unlawful taking. Bail was set at $50,000 bond.
Both guns were returned to Bailey. State police did not return a call for further details.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.