Thunderstorms down trees, utility lines in Armstrong County
By Tim Karan
Published: Thursday, June 27, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Severe thunderstorms tore through Armstrong County on Tuesday and Wednesday, leaving behind a slew of downed trees and utility lines.
The powerful system rolled in about 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, doing much of its damage in the area before 9 p.m. with fire and ambulance personnel responding during that span to more than 20 reports of down trees and lines in Bethel, Burrell, Cowanshannock, Gilpin, Kittanning, Leechburg, Manor Township, North Buffalo, Parks, Rayburn, South Buffalo and Valley Township.
West Penn Power, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp., reported more than 13,000 customers in Western Pennsylvania without power Tuesday evening.
Rain and heavy winds continued in some parts of the county overnight, leaving some residents in the dark through Wednesday morning.
As of about noon Wednesday, West Penn Power reported about 20 continued disruptions in the Kittanning area and others in the southern end of the county. Most were repaired before 2 p.m., according to a map on the company's website.
Parker-based Central Electric Cooperative, which had reported at least 1,000 customers without power in its seven-county region Tuesday night, had returned service to all but 60 as of early Wednesday afternoon. Central Electric also announced a peak energy alert and asked customers to conserve power until 6 p.m. because of increased demand.
Reports of trees and wires down continued coming into Armstrong 911 throughout Wednesday, and forecasts call for more thunderstorms in the area through late Thursday.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Plumcreek fire victim identified
- Man stabs couple who took him in, police say
- Park structure at center of Ford City investigation
- Kittanning vigil planned for mother in fatal collision