Share This Page

Rayburn man accused of firing at trooper outside his home

| Monday, July 1, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

RAYBURN — A 58-year-old township man was arrested on Saturday night after he was accused of firing a shotgun at a state police trooper while standing outside his trailer.

According to state police, Thomas Luketic, of 127 Fox Lane, shot his gun in the direction of the trooper from about 50 yards away.

The officer was investigating a 911 hang-up call from the home at 9:05 p.m. when Luketic allegedly confronted him.

The trooper, who was not injured during the incident, drove to a nearby site and called for police backup, the report said.

A perimeter was set up and police contacted Luketic by phone, ordering him to come outside and surrender, and he complied, police said.

Police said Luketic was intoxicated and had threatened his wife during a dispute. She called 911 before fleeing the residence and was close enough to see the trooper arrive and heard the gunshot, police add.

Following a search warrant, police said, they seized several long guns, ammunition and drug paraphernalia from Luketic's trailer.

He was taken into custody and arraigned before District Judge J. Gary DeComo, charged with two counts of simple assault, five counts of aggravated assault, two counts of disorderly conduct and one count each of reckless endangerment and making terroristic threats.

Luketic was placed in the Armstrong County Jail on a $100,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.