Rural Valley woman gives birth to girl weighing 13 pounds, 12 ounces
By Tim Karan
Published: Saturday, July 13, 2013, 1:31 a.m.
Michelle Cessna knew her baby was going to be big, but she didn't realize how big.
Addyson Gale Cessna was born by C-section on Thursday morning at ACMH Hospital, weighing in at a whopping 13 pounds, 12 ounces and measuring 25 inches.
Her mother, 37, of Rural Valley, said she and her husband, Mark, were told by doctors during the pregnancy that Addyson would likely come in at about 10 or 11 pounds.
“We have two sons — J.J. is 3 and Ryan is 2 — and they both were about 10 pounds when they were born,” Cessna said. “So we figured she'd be right about the same size.”
But when she first saw her daughter in the delivery room, Cessna immediately realized Addyson was born much larger than her sons were.
“I think I'm still in shock,” she said and laughed. “I don't think either of the doctors had ever delivered a baby this size.”
A spokesperson for ACMH said the hospital doesn't save that information and couldn't confirm whether or not the baby was record size.
Either way, Addyson is a big deal.
“She seems to be a celebrity all of a sudden,” Cessna said. “My little chunky monkey.”
Both mother and daughter are reportedly in good health and are expected to be released from the hospital on Saturday.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Plumcreek fire victim identified
- Man stabs couple who took him in, police say
- Park structure at center of investigation
- Ford City OKs 3 police officers
- Kittanning Salvation Army raises red-kettle goal by 12%
- Kittanning vigil honors mother of 3
- County board seeks members
- Belmont Complex plans ribbon-cutting to show off $2M in renovations
- Kittanning vigil planned for mother in fatal collision
- District weighs AP test charges
- Tentative budget keeps tax steady