ShareThis Page

Ford City councilman: Litter-strewn hill an 'attractive nuisance'

| Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013, 1:11 a.m.
Ford City councilman Jerry Miklos looks over the trash at Boulder Park with Ernest Rosenberger 10. Thursday July 31, 2013
Tom Mitchell| For the Leader Times
Ford City councilman Jerry Miklos looks over the trash at Boulder Park with Ernest Rosenberger 10. Thursday July 31, 2013

FORD CITY – Several weeks ago, broken bottles and rusty tin cans led to a mishap for Ernest Rosenberger, 10. Rosenberger told borough council that he was playing at Boulder Park when he ventured onto an adjacent wooded hillside with some friends to “build a fort.”

It was there that the youth accidentally cut a finger on one of the hundreds of broken bottles littering the hillside. A few days later, he asked council what, if anything, could be done about the dangerous litter.

Council member Jerry Miklos said that although the playground at the park is clean and well maintained, the hillside, which rises steeply to Route 66, is an attractive nuisance for some children.

Miklos said he believes the majority of the broken bottles, mostly beer bottles, land on the hillside after being thrown out of vehicles on Route 66. He said there is a path that meanders from the park through the hillside and ends on Ridge Avenue. Despite the steepness of the trail, a number of people climb or descend the hill nearly every day.

“I would say there are hundreds of bottles, mostly broken, and dozens of cans that litter the wooded hillside and the trail,” Miklos said. “In the past, volunteers have launched cleanup efforts, but more cans and bottles appear almost every week. We have a resident who routinely collects several large bags of trash weekly, but there's always more.”

Throughout the summer, between 10 and 20 children, most in the lower elementary school grades, attend organized play sessions in the park. Playground supervisor Taylor Fujini said she keeps close tabs on the children to ensure they stay on the neatly manicured lawn and away from the woods. Fujini said keeping the children away from the woods requires constant vigilance.

Miklos said that council missed an opportunity to ask PennDOT to erect a fence along the hillside portion of Route 66 several years ago when major road work was done on the highway. He said he will urge council to do so now.

Miklos said that volunteer groups or people doing community service could be used in a cleanup campaign but first there has to be a way to stop the flow of trash.

“Although the cans, bottles and other debris are a big problem,” Miklos said, “a bigger problem is the trail itself. It is very steep and parts of it are washed out. People sometimes use it when they want to walk to the Sheetz store or to Ford Cliff. The trail parallels the road way and once on top people walk along the highway which is very dangerous. There is no walkway. Something has to be done, and soon.”

Tom Mitchell is a Leader Times correspondent.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.