12 counties to share cost of $7.9M upgrade to 911 dispatch centers
Officials from Armstrong County and 11 other counties in Southwestern Pennsylvania plan to share the cost of a $7.9 million upgrade to their 911 dispatch centers.
The project will give 911 dispatchers across the 12 counties the same computer network and replace outdated machines.
Western Pennsylvania County Regional ESInet (WestCORE), which comprises a dozen counties, including Armstrong, Allegheny, Butler and Indiana, is working to replace outdated 911 customer premises equipment (CPE), said David Boyce, vice president of Harrisburg-based Mission Critical Partners.
“These counties came together as a consortium and asked Armstrong County to sponsor this project,” Boyce said. “The funds would not be covered by Armstrong County, but it will be divided among the 12 counties, based on the number of 911 work stations each county has.
“The final amount will be negotiated down.”
The Armstrong County commissioners awarded the project to Cassidian Communications and CenturyLink, based in Temecula, Calif., during their meeting last week. The project is being reviewed by solicitors in the 12 counties.
Randy Brozenick, director of public safety in Armstrong County, said the project was sent out to bid in February. Representaives from the companies visited emergency officials to demonstrate how the equipment works, he said.
Commissioner Rich Fink said working with WestCORE has been beneficial to Armstrong and the other counties.
“This is one area where partnerships and working together as groups, county-to-county, helps all of us save dollars for the same service,” Fink said. “It's a good venture for us, and I'm proud we're taking the lead.”
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.