Armstrong School District lunch prices hold steady
Lunch prices across Armstrong School District will not change this year. Armstrong School District administrators plan to hold the cost of lunches at $2.25 for elementary and $2.50 for secondary students, according to food services director LuAnn Fee.
Breakfast prices will also hold steady at $1.25, Fee added.
Over the last five years, the cost of lunch has increased by 5 percent in the elementary schools, and 14 percent in the secondary schools, from $2.15 in 2009-10 to $2.25 in the elementary school, and $2.50 in secondary schools this year.
According to the district website, the United States Department of Agriculture requires that lunches include:
• Between 550 to 650 calories for kindergarten through fifth grade, 600 to 700 calories for sixth through eighth grades, and 750 to 850 calories for grades nine through 12.
• At least one serving of fruits or vegetables.
• A variety of fruits and vegetables, offering at least three-quarters to one cup of vegetables, plus a half to one cup of fruit.
• At least half of the grain-based foods must be whole-grain enriched, and by next year, all grain-based foods must be whole-grain enriched.
• Less than 10 percent of calories can come from saturated fat, and each item contains zero grams per serving of trans fat.
• Only fat-free unflavored, 1 percent unflavored and fat-free flavored milk.
• Sodium must be limited to a maximum of 740 milligrams per meal, on average.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Apollo man’s car show raises more than $2,000 for cancer fund
- Emerald ash borers taking toll in Armstrong County
- Summer Jam returns to Ford City to benefit nonprofit
- Saber pride booming in Ford City’s final year
- Dogs brighten day at Ford City assisted-living facility
- Groups traveling uncharted waters to open Allegheny, Monongahela locks
- Drug use, medical problems cited as cause of West Kittanning crash
- Ramp work makes travel better for handicapped in Ford City, Kittanning
- Armstrong firefighters get pet-saving training with donated oxygen masks
- Kittanning’s holiday gifts come early for Ford City group
- Kittanning Township mulls property tax increase