Armstrong adopts high school logo
The Armstrong Junior-Senior High School Riverhawks' new logo took flight during a special school board meeting on Thursday.
The primary logo, which is blue and orange, was designed by Oliver Outdoor Advertising of Ford City. It prominently features the word “Armstrong,” in blue block-lettering, above “River,” stacked on top of “Hawks,” in white lettering, outlined in blue and orange, which are tied together by a hawk's head on the right side.
The secondary logo, which does not feature any words, is a circular hawk head in blue and orange.
The board approved the new logos after a 7-0 vote. School board members D. Royce Smeltzer and Paul Lobby were absent.
Superintendent Stan Chapp said the district worked with several graphic design companies, art teachers and community volunteers to collect potential logos for the new building.
Ford City Junior-Senior High Principal Michael Cominos, who collected designs for the district, said officials solicited designs for several months.
“We gave them the specific colors and ideas about the bird,” Cominos said. “We wanted a fierce looking animal – something that would be appropriate for Armstrong.
“We wanted something that would be timeless.”
Cominos said Oliver Outdoor Advertising was one of five graphic designers who submitted logos for the new school. The district has not received a bill from the company, and Cominos said he is unsure if they will charge for the logo.
The new school, which officials hope to complete in June 2015, comes with a $55 million price tag, and will house approximately 1,775 students in grades seven through 12 from the Kittanning and Ford City areas.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.