East Franklin man accused of striking another over $20
An East Franklin man was charged on Sunday for allegedly hitting another man over the head with a wrench twice over a $20 debt.
State Police charged Jason Lee Crawford, 36, of Glade Run Road with two counts of aggravated assault, one count of simple assault, disorderly conduct, harassment, criminal mischief, criminal trespassing, public drunkenness, driving with a suspended or revoked license and flight to avoid apprehension, trial or punishment, when he was accused of breaking into a trailer owned by Timothy Justin Bureau, 37, of Staley's Court Road, Kittanning, and hitting him with a pipe wrench.
According to a criminal complaint, filed by Trooper Chad Savannah, Crawford hit Bureau with the wrench, fracturing his skull above his left eyebrow.
Before the incident, Bureau agreed to pay Crawford $70 for helping him build a shed during the weekend but was only able to give him $50, Savannah wrote.
Bureau said he planned to pay Crawford the remainder of the money on Monday, according to the complaint.
After striking Bureau, police accuse Crawford of fleeing the residence, abandoning his car along Lower Troy Hill Road and attempting to hide from police in the woods.
Police arrested Crawford, and he was committed to the Armstrong County Jail by District Judge Gary DeComo on Monday. Bail was set at $100,000.
Crawford will have a preliminary hearing in District Judge James Owen's Kittanning courtroom on Oct. 2.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.