Share This Page

Cellphone towers could signal revenue for Armstrong County

| Friday, Oct. 18, 2013, 12:26 a.m.

Cellular phone towers on county-owned properties could lead to additional revenue for Armstrong County.

The Armstrong County Commissioners approved an agreement with McMurray-based LJS Development Corp. to lease vacant county properties and rooftops to install cellular phone towers.

The county would receive 30 percent of all revenues from towers installed on vacant land and 70 percent of revenues from towers installed on county-owned rooftops, according to the county 911 coordinator, Ronald Baustert.

Last year, LJS Development approached the county about marketing its properties to cellphone carriers, who may want to install towers to offer 4G service, which would provide high-speed mobile ultra-broadband Internet access and phone service in Armstrong County.

Baustert said county officials presented LJS Development with a list of vacant properties and rooftops, which the company plans to present to several cellular phone carriers.

“The carriers have to evaluate the properties and decide where, but right now there is no time frame on when or where the towers will be installed or how much revenue they could bring in,” Baustert said. “But they're looking primarily at county-owned, undeveloped land and rooftops.”

The towers will not be a county expense — the cellphone service providers would be responsible for the installation and maintenance of each tower, he added.

“This is pure revenue for the county, with absolutely no overhead cost,” Baustert said.

The county commissioners unanimously agreed to allow LJS Development to market the properties to cellphone providers.

Commissioner Bob Bower said the agreement is a good deal for the county.

“This sounds like a win-win situation,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.