Tour participants see results of area farm conservation practices
Participants of a conservation bus tour, organized by the Armstrong Conservation District, traveled to West Franklin and Manor townships on Friday to witness the results of conservation practices on an area farm, along a streambed and along a portion of a dirt and gravel road.
Federal and state-elected officials and representatives; members of the ACD board of directors and associates; and representatives from the Department of Environmental Protection Agency attended the tour.
The Burke Farm in West Franklin, which raises 150 Angus beef cattle and two horses, was the first stop on the tour.
The 341-acre farm has about 150 acres of tillable ground; 310 acres are rented out. The family owns a total of 651 acres.
Jessica Schaub, an agricultural conservation technician with ACD, said the Burkes were able to implement agricultural management practices using funds from a $479,000 DEP Growing Greener grant awarded in 2009.
Those practices and improvements included the installation of an animal rail and concrete walkway; a 12-foot deep, 118-foot circular concrete waste storage tank; fencing; the construction of a heavy-use area with a covered roof and vaccination chute; and the addition of an access road.
Before the improvements began in April, there was no contained manure storage area to prevent waste runoff, Schaub said.
Since the construction of the slanted push-off ramp and concrete storage facility, rainwater helps to naturally liquefy the manure so it can be stored and redistributed as fertilizer to the acreage most in need of nutrient replenishment.
Schaub said the DEP requires at least a 15-percent match from participating farmers either through construction costs or salary.
The next stop on the tour highlighted streambed stabilization and management practices along a West Franklin portion of the Patterson Run Watershed.
Watershed Specialist David Beale said the edge of the bank had been eroding.
But as a result of Hurricane Ivan in 2004, Beale said, the section of the stream — labeled a sensitive stream by the DEP — underwent a stabilization project to reduce erosion.
That section with its data logger “held up really well through recent flooding,” Beale said.
Chelsea Walker, an Americorps member, said data loggers help monitor the water level, temperature and content of the stream.
She said that ACD partnered with the Kiski-Conemaugh Stream Team in 2011 to monitor a total of seven streams.
The data results help to determine management practices and can monitor possible changes in water content from mining practices, gas well development, agricultural practices and from home and commercial construction.
Walker said more volunteers are needed to check the data loggers.
Volunteer John Linkes has accompanied Walker to area streams to check on data and said he enjoys participating in citizen science.
“I like being in the outdoors,” he said.
Dave Rupert, ACD district manager, said the cooperation of landowners is required before a data logger is installed in a designated sensitive stream.
The tour concluded in Manor at a dirt and gravel road project where inadequate cross pipes leading from a private driveway were replaced to control flooding and ponding on the road.
According to the ACD, Manor Township installed six cross pipes and 1,300 feet of under drains. Pipe outlets were stabilized, and more than 500 tons of limestone have been applied to rebuild the road base.
Because funding is limited, the project is being done over three years and will include repairing and resolving the drainage issues on the remainder of the road.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.