2nd man charged in Vandergrift copper theft
Police charged a second Vandergrift man for allegedly taking rolls of copper from Lawrence Plumbing in September.
State police charged Brian Keith McKean, 27, with burglary, criminal trespassing, theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and two counts of criminal conspiracy for allegedly taking seven rolls of copper, valued at approximately $2,600, between Sept. 14 and 18 from Lawrence Plumbing's facility on Industrial Park Road, Parks.
Last week, police charged Justin Keith McMasters, 24, with two counts of burglary, two counts of criminal trespassing, one count of theft by unlawful taking, one count of receiving stolen property and two counts of criminal conspiracy for allegedly helping McKean take the rolls of copper.
According to police, McMasters and McKean were caught on security cameras pulling a green Ford Ranger truck into the warehouse, loading the copper rolls and driving away on Sept. 14 at 9:30 a.m.
According to police, the men took the copper to Tomson's Scrap Yard in Brackenridge, where they scrapped 293 pounds of the metal for $820.40, which they split.
McMasters returned to the facility on Sept. 18 at 9:50 p.m., when he did not take anything but looked directly into a security camera, police said.
Police used the footage to identify McMasters and arrested him on Nov. 6 at his mother's home in Vandergrift. He was ordered to be held inthe Armstrong County Jail by District Judge James Owen.
McMasters waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Wednesday before District Judge James Andring in Leechburg.
McKean, who was incarcerated for a probation violation, was arraigned before Andring on Wednesday for allegedly taking the copper rolls and is awaiting a preliminary hearing. Bail was set at $25,000.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.