Nearly one-third of the seats on the Armstrong County Non-Profit Housing Corporation remain vacant.
Despite reappointing two longterm members to the county group, Armstrong County commissioners still need to fill two of seven seats on its board, according to Carmen Johnson, assistant director of the county's Department of Planning and Development.
The commissioners reappointed Commissioner Bob Bower of Kittanning and David Page of Worthington to the board in a 2-0 vote, with Bower abstaining. Each plans to serve a five-year term.
Bower, who serves as the corporation's secretary, has been a member of the board for 26 years, while Page has served for 10 years, Johnson said.
The corporation provides grants for rehabilitating homes for property owners who meet certain income or disability requirements, Bower said.
The corporation's board works through the county's Department of Planning and Development to issue and administer the grants and review and approve applications for grants, Johnson added.
“They also review applications for new housing throughout the county,” Johnson said.
The Non-Profit Housing Corporation meets the second Thursday of each month at 5:15 p.m. in the Department of Planning and Development building's conference room, 402 Market St., Kittanning.
Anyone interested in volunteering for a seat on the Non-Profit Housing Corporation should send a letter of interest to the Armstrong County Commissioners' office in the Courthouse Administration Building, 450 East Market St., Suite 200, Kittanning, PA 16201.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.