Share This Page

Kittanning vigil planned for mother in fatal collision

| Saturday, Dec. 7, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Staci Rosborough-Shaffer
Staci Rosborough-Shaffer

KITTANNING — It's been almost two years to the day since 38-year-old Staci Rosborough Haslett died from injuries suffered in a 2010 one-vehicle crash — a crash that eventually left her three children motherless and in which her husband was later implicated and sentenced on a charge of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence.

Now that the court proceedings are over, Staci's family plans to hold a candlelight ceremony at 6 p.m. Sunday in the Kittanning Riverfront Park to celebrate and honor her life.

“We want to remember the good things,” said Staci's mother, Pamela McCullough. “She was a loving mother. She was a great friend and a wonderful daughter.”

McCullough said the sentencing of Keith Robert Haslett, 29, in June helped the family move on.

“We waited till it was all over,” she said.

The family wants all those who knew and loved Staci to join them at the ceremony to share their memories of her.

McCullough said there are many people from the Kittanning area who knew Staci but never knew what happened to her.

She was a 1990 graduate of Lenape Technical School and worked at Fantastic Sams hair salon in East Franklin before opening her own business, Staci's Angel Haire Salon, in Kittanning.

Staci's legal name at the time of her death was Staci Leigh Rosborough Haslett, but the last name etched on her gravestone marking her Dec. 9, 2011 death reads Rosborough-Shaffer.

It is how the family wishes her to be remembered, McCullough said.

Staci's children, Bethanie, Scottie and Tristan Shaffer — now 16, 18 and 19 — are from her previous marriage to Scott Shaffer, McCullough said.

She said Staci and Haslett had only been married for one year before the September 2010 crash in Rayburn left Staci a quadriplegic for the remaining 15 months of her life.

McCullough said that Staci lived out her remaining life in Sugar Creek Rest, Sugarcreek Township, hooked up to a ventilator and paralyzed from the chest down. She did not remember the night of the accident.

“She liked to dance and loved music,” McCullough said. “She knew she would never dance again.”

McCullough recalled how involved Staci had been in her children's lives, how she spent so much time supporting them in their sports and activities.

“(Staci's) daughter, Bethanie, was excited about having something for her mom,” McCullough said, referring to Sunday's candlelight service.

The Rev. Joyce Dix-Weiers of Mt. Union Lutheran Church in Plumcreek will be officiating.

According to court records, the crash that led to Staci's death happened at about 2:15 a.m. along Route 85 near Stonehouse Road on Sept. 5, 2010.

The affidavit notes that Haslett told state police he and Staci had left a bar and had been arguing when he lost control of their Chevrolet Trailblazer. The vehicle hit a telephone pole, traveled down a small slope and rolled over before it struck a tree.

Staci was flown from the scene to UPMC Presbyterian Hospital in Pittsburgh.

Haslett was initially charged with aggravated assault by a vehicle while driving under the influence.

When Staci died, that charge was changed (in January 2012) to vehicular homicide while driving under the influence.

Haslett pleaded guilty to the charge in March and was sentenced by President Judge Kenneth Valasek in June to serve 36 to 72 months in a state prison.

Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or bbeatty@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.