Share This Page

Fire destroys Rural Valley home

| Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, 1:49 p.m.

No one was injured when a fire tore through a Rural Valley home in Cowanshannock Township shortly before midnight on Wednesday.

Melvin Toy, who rented the two-story house at 624 W. Parkwood Drive, escaped with his wife, Diane, and his stepson, Terry Meyer, when they discovered smoke pouring from a back bedroom at about 11:30 p.m., Rural Valley Fire Chief Kevin Nelson said on Thursday.

“By the time we arrived on scene, it was fully involved,” Nelson said.

Fire was coming out through a window of the first floor and had spread onto the second floor when firefighters arrived. The house owned by Flora and Melanie Davidson was destroyed by the fire, Nelson said. The Davidsons had not insured the building, and the Toy family did not have renter's insurance.

“They lost everything,” Nelson said.

The cause of the fire is under investigation. The home did not have a water heater or furnace and was heated by propane, kerosene and electric heaters, the chief said.

Melvin Toy told Nelson that when he moved into the house he agreed to install the basic amenities, but had yet to do so.

Toy and his family were assisted by the Red Cross.

The Rural Valley Volunteer Fire Department, which is a few blocks from the destroyed home, was assisted by Dayton and Plumville fire departments.

Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or bbeatty@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.