Charges may be refiled in Dayton family crash
Charges have been withdrawn against a Dayton man accused in connection with a New Year's Eve crash in Cowanshannock, but are expected to be refiled once he is discharged from the hospital after treatment for injuries he suffered in the accident, a district judge said Friday.
Kody Michael Righi, 28, was charged with eight felony counts of aggravated assault and misdemeanor, which include 10 counts of simple assault and five counts of reckless endangerment, in connection with the crash in which his wife, Chytel Righi and her four children were all in the car and injured.
“He will be recharged after he is discharged from the hospital,” District Judge Samuel Goldstrohm said.
The one-car crash on Route 839 occurred when Righi allegedly jerked the steering wheel during a domestic incident while his wife was driving, which caused the Chevrolet Cavalier to go off the road, Trooper Terry Geibel said.
All four children, ages 2, 4, 7 and 11, suffered severe injuries and were later listed in stable condition at Children's Hospital in Pittsburgh.
Chytel and Kody Righi were transported to UPMC Presbyterian with severe injuries.
No updates were available Friday from UPMC Presbyterian and Children's Hospital on the conditions of Kody, Chytel and the children.
All of Righi's 23 charges were withdrawn and his arrest warrant was canceled on Jan. 8 because of the injuries sustained, Goldstrohm said Friday. The decision was made during a consultation with District Attorney Scott Andreassi and state police concerning the defendant's right to a speedy trial, he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.