Share This Page

West Kittanning council changes leadership

| Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

West Kittanning Council's leadership underwent an unexpected change on Tuesday.

Councilman Henry Mores, who had been hospitalized in early January, called for another council reorganization during the meeting.

In the process, Cliff Neal was removed as council president.

“I was cheated out of not having a vote (during the first reorganization meeting),” Mores said.

Council named Bob Venesky as its president, after a 3-3 vote, with Mayor James Sobiski casting the deciding vote.

Councilwoman Paula Henry was absent.

“The people spoke during the last election, which is why I voted to make him president,” Sobiski said.

Venesky, who council elected as vice president in January, was the top vote-getter in the November election, with 237 votes.

Neal voted for himself to keep his position as president, along with council members Nancy Capone and Ken Trudgen.

Voting for Venesky were himself, Mores and Ed Morris.

Council voted in Mores as vice president, 5-0, with Capone abstaining.

Solicitor Andrew Sacco said council can change its president and vice president at any time.

“These positions serve at the pleasure of council, so, at any time, they can reorganize,” Sacco said.

During the Jan. 7 reorganization meeting, Neal defeated Venesky for the president's seat, 3-2.

Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or bpedersen@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.