Escaped inmate back in Armstrong jail, authorities say
An Armstrong County Jail inmate who escaped from his work release job at the county maintenance garage on Wednesday is back in jail on $75,000 bond.
Zachary Carter Eckman, 23, of Kittanning was caught in less than four hours after walking out of the garage near the courthouse on Market Street, Sheriff Bill Rupert said.
Eckman is serving a sentence of six to 24 months on charges of theft and criminal conspiracy.
“He had gained everyone's trust and was allowed to do work release,” Rupert said.
But shortly before 2:30 p.m. — right before he was supposed to be taken back to jail — Eckman walked off the job.
Eckman was spotted by a correctional officer about 6 p.m. along North Water Street riding as a passenger in a friend's white Pontiac Grand Am, the criminal complaint alleges. But Eckman was not in the car when it was stopped by state police.
Driver Harley Storrs told police he had dropped Eckman off and arranged to pick up the fugitive again so he could be arrested. Within 10 minutes, police stopped the car again, this time with Eckman inside.
Eckman allegedly got out of the vehicle and ran south on Orr Street before being tackled to the ground by a trooper, the complaint said.
He was arrested on a felony escape charge and misdemeanor charges of resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.
He is awaiting a preliminary hearing before District Judge James Owen on those charges.
Storrs will not be charged in connection with the case, Rupert said.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.