Armstrong officials pleased with sale of 25 parcels during property auction
By Brad Pedersen
Published: Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, 12:31 a.m.
Officials are happy with the results of Armstrong County's first auction of properties it owns because of non-payment of taxes, even though only 25 of 172 parcels put on the block were sold.
“I was pleasantly surprised at the amount of people who attended, and very happy with the number of properties that sold,” said Jeanne Englert, director of the county Tax Claim Bureau. “This was a straight win — we sold properties and made money, but the biggest part is these properties will be back on the tax rolls and the county is no longer liable for them.”
The auction brought in $11,350, with a 2-acre parcel in East Franklin receiving the largest bid of $5,700. The 147 unsold properties will go on the auction block again in July.
About 50 people attended Thursday's auction in the Armstrong County Courthouse.
Properties owned by the county generate no tax revenue and were either vacant, contained mobile homes or dilapidated structures and depleted mineral rights. So every parcel sold at the auction is a bonus for the county, Englert said.
“Fixing and cleaning these properties up brings the value up to where it should be and increases our tax revenue,” she added.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kittanning youths OK after Route 422 crash
- Riverhawks take long view of new school site
- Ford City sets public meeting to discuss water supply
- Armstrong Riverhawks sample band uniform displayed during school board meeting