Flooding threat ebbs along Allegheny in Parker
Ice is stacked high along the banks of the Allegheny River in Parker, and officials say they are not expecting more problems with flooding along Route 268 in this city in the northern tip of Armstrong County.
“That ice is stacked so high that it'll probably be there until next winter,” said Mayor William McCall.
The area was hit by floods during warmer periods throughout the winter. Expectations were that the thick ice that formed in the harsh winter would be the source of more problems once temperatures began rising in March.
City officials prepared evacuation plans, and county crews readied emergency water supplies in preparation for the worst. But the worst never came. The water level now is at seven feet, well below the flooding stage of 20 and emergency level of 23.
Meteorologist Rihaan Gangat, with the National Weather Service in Moon, said a slow thawing and freezing process kept the ice from breaking away rapidly and jamming along the Allegheny River. Ice jams are frequently the source of flooding problems.
“Ice jams are impossible to predict, but we only saw a few minor ones this year around Brady's Bend and Parker, which weren't enough to cause flooding,” he said. “Now, it's breaking up and moving nicely.”
Gangat said temperatures should remain well above freezing for the rest of the winter, with low temperatures dipping into the mid-30s this weekend.
McCall said emergency officials considered this winter's flood threat a learning experience.
“We were very fortunate because everybody worked so well together this year,” McCall said. “Next year, if something happens, we have plans under our belt and will be ready to respond quickly and efficiently.”
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.