Bomb threat clears Ford City school again
A bomb threat on Monday morning forced the evacuation of Ford City Junior-Senior High School for the second time in less than a week.
Principal Michael Cominossaid police evacuated the school early Monday when a threat was found.
Cominos would not disclose where school administrators found the threat or whether it was linked to a similar threat that forced officials to evacuate the school on Wednesday.
No one was injured, and no bomb was found during searches in the school, Cominos said.
School officials contacted students' parents through the district's phone alert system. Although classes reconvened, Cominos said parents were allowed to take their children home from school.
“Several parents did come and get their children, and it created a real traffic jam in downtown Ford City,” Cominos said. “Our students' safety is our main priority, and we're going to continue to investigate (the threats).”
Officers from the Ford City, Mercer and Manorville police departments, Armstrong County Detective Bureau, and the Armstrong, Mercer and Lawrence county sheriff's departments responded, Cominos said.
Police dogs from several departments combed the school but did not find anything, he added.
School officials canceled after-school activities on Monday but will have a regular class schedule on Tuesday.
The school was evacuated on Wednesday when a note saying a bomb would go off in two hours was found about 11 a.m. in a girls' locker room. West Shamokin Junior-Senior High School was evacuated that day when a note saying “Boom at 2:20” was found scrawled on the wall of a locker room.
No bomb was found in searches by police at the schools.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.