Paving project may ease some Fifth Avenue problems in Ford City
Coal truck traffic on Fifth Avenue — state Route 128 — in Ford City may get quieter when a PennDOT paving project is finished this summer, but it's not likely to go away.
“We can't prohibit or restrict trucks from driving on a state road,” PennDOT maintenance program engineer Courtney Snyder said at a Thursday morning meeting to discuss the summer paving project and address concerns about truck traffic on Fifth Avenue.
Residents have complained of traffic they say is noisy and even destructive to their homes as coal trucks rumble down the rutted road carrying their loads.
“These people on Fifth Avenue are going through hell,” Councilman Jerry Miklos said.
The $1.6 million paving project that starts in June and should be complete by August will mean a smoother road to dampen the noise and ease vibrations caused by the trucks, said PennDOT assistant district executive for design Brian Allen.
“We're trying to get the road maintained and will get rid of ruts and sink holes,” he said.
Snyder suggested that a long-term solution for residents might involve Ford City officials working with trucking companies to get them to voluntarily alter their routes through the borough.
Resident Rachel Dinus asked about another solution: the addition of traffic lights or stop signs to slow trucks down as they travel through the borough.
“There are rules and regulations about that — they cannot be used for speed control, only for traffic control,” Snyder said.
Brigid Beatty is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.