ShareThis Page

Sink or swim for Lenape students at competition in Butler

| Friday, May 2, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
Lenape Tech students Riley Johnson, Lynsie Headley and Luke Waltz work on a wire harness for their submarine that will compete in the  Sea, Air and Land Challenge at Butler Community College Saturday.
Thursday May 1, 2014
Louis B.Ruediger | Leader Times
Lenape Tech students Riley Johnson, Lynsie Headley and Luke Waltz work on a wire harness for their submarine that will compete in the Sea, Air and Land Challenge at Butler Community College Saturday. Thursday May 1, 2014

Some Lenape Technical School students are counting on their latest project to hold water — literally — and surface as a winner in Saturday's Sea, Air and Land Challenge at Butler County Community College.

A team of juniors and seniors from the Manor school have been putting their heads together for four months to build a robotic submarine for the competition hosted by the Penn State Electro-Optics Center in South Buffalo.

The challenge pits teams from five schools against each other to see whose robots can make it through obstacle courses with a payload. In addition to Lenape, teams from Seneca Valley, Norwin, Butler and Kiski Area school districts will compete.

“We have somewhat of an advantage as a technical school,” mechatronics teacher Eric Longwell said about Lenape's first foray into the event.

As the name of the event implies, robots will be tested in obstacles on land, in the air and underwater. Lenape's two teams have been working on their robot since January. The submarine team called the Barracudas will send a robot through a course in a 26,000 gallon water tank. The course requires the robots to be able to detect hot and cold spots under water.

Another team, the Land Sharks, will make their way with a tank-like robot through an obstacle course with side walls and other obstacles.

Students built and programmed the robots, all the while making sure their project is within budget constraints and deadlines. The final creations are roughly a foot long and weigh between five and 10 pounds.

The project had a budget of $750, according to organizers. Lenape spent about $300 total on the teams' projects. Resourceful students pitched in, finding items at the school that would work and bringing in materials from family machine shops.

Barracuda team member Lynsie Headley, 18, of Ford City has never done a project like their submarine before. A senior studying computer-aided design and drafting for pre-engineering, she plans to pursue mechanical engineering at Penn State's New Kensington campus.

“I've learned a lot more about electrical stuff,” she said about getting ready for the competition. “This really showed me about different aspects of electronics.”

Headley's teammate, Jake Waltz, 17, of Leechburg, said there was more to the challenge than he'd expected. He is studying CADD for engineering technology.

“It was interesting learning the engineering project,” he said. “It was something we'd never done before.”

Heather Simpson, who teaches pre-engineering tech at Lenape, said students are excited and a little nervous as the competition approaches.

“It's kind of hard to test a submarine when we don't have a pool,” she said.

But she added that trial and error is an important part of the process: “In engineering, there's always something that's going to go wrong somewhere, and you're going to learn from it.”

Julie E. Martin is a freelance reporter for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.