Arson charged after fire destroys Cowanshannock home
A NuMine man is charged with arson in connection with a fire on Monday night at the two-story home of a neighbor, whom he accused of stealing his chainsaw.
William Ray Hulsey, 40, of Fifth Street, is charged with four felony counts of arson and one summary count of dangerous burning. He is accused of setting a couch on fire in the living room of the home at 4061 Second St., Cowanshannock, owned by Simon Semanovich.
Semanovich told police Hulsey came to his home looking for the chainsaw, and on his second visit, he broke out a window and tore pictures off the wall. The third time her returned, Hulsey allegedly lit the couch on fire, according to the criminal complaint filed with state police.
Semanovich attempted to drag the burning couch out of the house, but was overcome by smoke and fled to a neighbor's to call 911, the complaint said.
No one was injured in the fire, but the house was destroyed, said Kevin Nelson, Rural Valley fire chief.
The uninsured home is owned by Semanovich's brother, Michael. Simon Semanovich was displaced by the fire and is staying with family members, Nelson said.
“The inside is completely gutted and the front is gone from the fire,” Nelson said.
District Judge Samuel Goldstrohm arraigned Hulsey and committed him to the Armstrong County Jail in lieu of $100,000 bail on Tuesday. He faces a preliminary hearing on May 20.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.