Homeless man charged with Kittanning van theft
A homeless man was arrested on Thursday for allegedly stealing a minivan.
Kittanning police arrested Daniel Ray Johns, 20. He is accused of taking a red 2002 Honda Odyssey van, owned by Robert and Dana Grant, while it was parked in front of a Kittanning store with the keys inside on Tuesday at 12:03 a.m.
The van was involved in a hit-and-run accident later that day at Montieth Street and Johnston Avenue, a police report said. Robert Grant found the van on Wednesday parked behind St. Mary, Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish on West High Street, but told police Johns backed it into another vehicle and fled when he approached.
Police were able to track Johns down at a home on Second Street the next day. During his arrest, Johns attempted to flee but was caught a short time after he ran away, police said.
Police found the van behind the Rayburn Township Volunteer Fire Department on Clearfield Pike.
Johns faces felony charges of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property, escape and theft of a motor vehicle, misdemeanor charges of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, resisting arrest and two counts of involvement in an accident resulting in damage to an attended vehicle or property, and a summary count of reckless driving.
District Judge James Owen committed Johns to the Armstrong County Jail in lieu of $25,000 bond. A preliminary hearing is scheduled on Wednesday.
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.