Inmates cleaning up Armstrong roads
Four Armstrong County Jail inmates collected 37 bags of trash in June during the first outing of a retooled work release program.
Another group could be out cleaning up the streets by the end of the week.
“The program has gone really well, even though we've only gotten out once,” Sheriff Bill Rupert said. “We'd like to try to start getting them out once a week, but it all comes down to our court case load and the weather.”
The Sheriff's Department outfitted the inmates in neon green jumpsuits and took them out to the park and ride at the Edgewood intersection in Manor to pick up trash on June 12. The crews cleaned three miles of Route 66.
Inmates who are deemed non-violent and are not sex offenders are paid 25 cents per hour to do jobs such as cleaning up trash, mowing grass and painting curbs in the program.
Rupert planned to take the inmates out last Thursday but was stopped by thunderstorms.
The county had a similar work release program from 2006, until it was stopped in February when an inmate walked off the job while working at a maintenance garage near the courthouse. The inmate was caught less than four hours later.
Rupert said he plans to limit crews to four inmates, who will be supervised by at least three sheriff's deputies in the new program.
“I think a program like this is needed to do trash pickups around Armstrong County,” Rupert said. “Hopefully, we'll be getting the inmates cleaning our streets on a more regular basis.”
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.