Heavy rains pour through Armstrong County
A lightning show and heavy rains on Sunday kept residents and emergency responders in Armstrong County busy into Monday morning dealing with minor floods and about a dozen downed trees and power wires.
“I heard it pouring pretty hard last night, and when I woke up this morning and looked out into the yard, it looked like Niagara Falls was here,” Kittanning resident Bonnie McMillen said, standing outside her home on Johnston Street. “I've got a gully in my backyard now.”
Water from a backed-up drain on Sinwell Street tore through the McMillens' yard, uprooting sections of lawn and leaving mud, rocks and other debris in its tracks.
“It's amazing what heavy rains can do,” McMillen said.
Lee Hendricks, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Moon, said the storms dropped about 1 to 2.2 inches of rain across Armstrong, Indiana and Venango counties.
“We don't have exact wind speeds, but there were fairly strong thunderstorms in the area,” Hendricks said. “And the entire region had a fairly nice light show because of all the lightning.”
Emergency crews responded to reports of flooded basements in East Franklin, Manorville, West Kittanning and Rayburn, said Randy Brozenick, Armstrong County director of public safety. Residents in Manor lost power from about 9 p.m. Sunday to 6 a.m. Monday when high winds downed power lines in the area.
“Luckily, that was our biggest issue,” Brozenick said. “We don't have anybody left without power.”
Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.