2 streets added to Kittanning projects
Kittanning Borough is adding two more streets to its to-do list.
Council members approved adding new stretches of North Mc-Kean and North Jefferson streets to its paving plans.
Money originally slated for Jacob Street — part of a $700,000 state loan covering some of the revitalization work — will go toward the newly selected sections instead.
The North McKean work will extend from Vine Street to Union Avenue. On North Jefferson, it will start at Arch Street and end at Vine.
The work will include paving the roads and building handicapped-accessible ramps.
The change is possible because a state transportation grant to cover work on Jacob Street has been “ranked very high” as it moves through the selection process, said Jennifer Bellas, director of Armstrong County's Community Development office.
There are no guarantees on that grant yet. If it makes the cut, the award will be made by September, Bellas said.
Diverting money to additional work on North McKean and North Jefferson is “a chance that needs to be taken,” said Council President Randy Cloak.
“Hopefully, we'll see funding. Doing that is enabling us to do more paving,” he said.
The grant award that would cover the Jacob Street repairs could exceed $100,000, he said.
Despite the change in plans, Jacob Street will be on the radar, even if the grant is not awarded. Were that to happen, Kittanning would continue to look for money to cover its repairs, Cloak said.
“It's still an important street,” he said.
As a bonus, the grant would free up some money from the $700,000 loan. That could then be used as a required match for the Jacob Street grant, Cloak said.
Julie E. Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.