Cyber school founder's kin charged
Federal prosecutors on Friday charged the sister of the founder of a Beaver County cyber charter school with filing a false tax return.
Elaine Trombetta Neill of Center claimed income on her 2010 tax return that “was properly attributable to a relative” and deducted $90,600 in business expenses for “One 2 One,” which had “almost no legitimate business expenses,” the criminal information says.
Federal prosecutors normally file an information, as opposed to seeking a grand jury indictment, when the defendant has agreed to cooperate with investigators and plead guilty.
The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment.
There was no number available for Neill.
Her attorney, Jim Ross, declined to comment.
The federal charge says that Neill reported the illegal deductions on a Schedule C, which is the form used for reporting profits or losses from sole proprietorships.
Under Pennsylvania law, people who operate sole proprietorships under some name other than their own have to register the name with the State Department. Neill in 2006 registered the name “one2one Enterprises” with a business address of 611 Owens St., Aliquippa, according to state records.
Nick Trombetta, the founder of Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School in Midland, owned the house at 611 Owens St. until last year, according to Beaver County property records.
Trombetta couldn't be reached for comment.
Federal agents in July served search warrants and subpoenas on the school, the nonprofit National Network of Digital Schools and other sites in Pennsylvania and Ohio tied to the school. The Justice Department released a statement saying the school is not a target of the investigation.
Staff writers Bob Bauder and Bill Vidonic contributed to this report. Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.