Bail hearing for Beaver Co. sheriff scheduled
Beaver County Sheriff George David faces a Nov. 22 hearing on whether his bail will be revoked or modified while he awaits trial on charges that he threatened a reporter, intimidated witnesses and threatened a campaign volunteer.
The state Attorney General's office said in a court filing last week that David “has had contact with witnesses and the victim both directly and through third parties,” a violation of one of his bail conditions. The court filing does not offer specifics about the alleged violations.
State police said David threatened John Paul Vranesevich, the operator of the Beaver Countian news website, with his service revolver during an April 16, 2012, interview.
Police also claim David kept deputies “from truthfully reporting David's wrongdoing” to them and to a state investigating grand jury. He also is accused on Nov. 5, 2011, of threatening to cut off and eat the hands of campaign worker Daniel Fleishman.
This is the second time that the attorney general has sought to have David's $50,000 unsecured bail revoked or modified. After a June 19 hearing, a judge said David can't hold news conferences on county property, but he's permitted to hunt on his property, or elsewhere with permission, while he awaits trial, which is scheduled for February.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.