Man described as 'fiscal pit bull' to quit Butler post
Butler County Controller John R. McMillin, Jr. Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Photo by Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Butler County Controller Jack McMillin said Monday he intends to retire when his fifth term ends in December.
McMillin, 60, whom a colleague described as a fiscal “pit bull, not a watchdog” in keeping an eye on county spending, said he has accomplished what he set out to do when he first ran in 1993.
“I don't want to wear my welcome out, and I mean that sincerely,” the Zelienople Republican said. “Politics is a strange business and I'd rather leave one election too early than one election too late.”
Commissioner James Eckstein, a Democrat, said he often sought the controller's advice during his first years in office. Eckstein said McMillin is an outspoken opponent about foolish spending and is passionate about controlling government costs.
“He does more than watch,” Eckstein said. “He uses his teeth sometimes. I'm very disappointed that he's leaving.”
McMillin said publicized acrimony among the three county commissioners did not influence his decision to leave office after 2013. He said he plans to spend more time with his two children, go fishing and do a lot of reading, especially classical poetry. He dabbles in writing Shakespearean sonnets.
He said he would consider running for higher office, perhaps county commissioner. McMillin said both Republican commissioners, William L. McCarrier and A. Dale Pinkerton, have said they won't run again.
“The hardest part is leaving my staff,” he said. “I'll take a year off and sift through things and maybe reconstitute myself. Who knows what's out there in store.”
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.