ShareThis Page

McNabb's first season deemed a success

| Saturday, March 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Knoch junior point guard Austin Miller described his team's approach to its WPIAL preliminary-round playoff game with Mt. Pleasant as “business as usual.”

But the game meant more than that to the program. The Knights had not won a playoff game since 2006 and were riding on the heels of six consecutive losing seasons.

“We wanted to do something,” Miller said. “We're a football school, but we wanted to make a name for the basketball team.”

First-year coach Ron McNabb echoed Miller's sentiment.

“They'd heard a lot, read a lot, that Knoch hadn't won a playoff game in seven years,” McNabb said. “I don't think they took it personally, but they took it as a challenge.”

From his perspective, the team took the entire season as a challenge.

McNabb, 51, who coached at Burrell and Valley before serving as an assistant the past two years at Plum, was hired on July 11 to replace Josh Shoop, who filled the athletic director vacancy at Pine-Richland.

It was an atypically late time of the year to hire a new basketball coach.

“I was completely sold on the fact that I was going back to Plum,” McNabb said.

A math instructor at Knoch for the past 25 years, McNabb estimates he missed approximately five months of off-season preparation due to his late appointment. That meant having to sacrifice strategy sessions to focus on skills — like ball-handling and shooting — and amping up the intensity to make up for time lost.

“‘I'm not going to lie, (the practices) were hard,” said senior forward Dakota Bruggeman.

“But they weren't impossible to get through.”

By the team's second practice, Bruggeman said, McNabb had gained the players' trust, and they began to see results.

“If Coach McNabb came up to you and tried facing your shot, if you did what he said, it would go in,” Bruggeman said.

After that relatively brief summer introduction, McNabb said there wasn't a tangible goal attached to the Knights' season, just an intent to maximize the team's potential.

“One thing we never did mention was wins or losses,” he said. “We said we want to be the hardest working team that we can — and they did. They came in and worked hard for us.”

After some middling early-season results, the Knights hit their stride around Christmas, winning five in a row and taking the Freeport Tournament.

Players such as Miller (10.6 ppg) and senior forward Marc Vaughn (11.6 ppg) were key cogs in the Knights' offense. But the team's real strength came through a defense that surrendered 51.4 points per game.

The Knights traded wins and losses before finishing the regular season at 11-11 and, defying the expectations of some, secured a playoff berth by finishing in fourth place in Section 1-AAA.

Which led to the match-up with Mt. Pleasant.

“I didn't see a lot of nervousness in the locker room,” McNabb said. “But I did see a lot of intense kids.”

Knoch won 62-50, breaking the streak.

“I almost lost my voice celebrating,” Bruggeman said. “It was great to bring a win back to Knoch basketball by playing great defense. That was the great thing, we just clicked. We did what we could do and played hard defense.”

Knoch fell to top-seeded Chartiers Valley in the next round, but that didn't matter, Miller said. The season was a success.

“I'm still proud of our first playoff win,” he said.

“Next season, I feel like we can now compete for the section title and make a long run into the playoffs.”

Stephen Catanese is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.