Cranberry Woods project to get review
Cranberry development officials on Monday will discuss the Village of Cranberry Woods project, which features the planned UPMC-Pittsburgh Penguins sports medicine facility.
The township's planning advisory commission will listen to information from Ron Henshaw, the township's director of community development, about the master development plan, which includes a mix of retail shops, hotels and office buildings along Route 228.
The main attraction has been the UPMC-backed sports training center and hockey practice rink that the Penguins would use when Consol Energy Center is not available.
UPMC would build and own the facility, and the Penguins are expected to lease most of it.
Henshaw said developers will make their presentation July 1 and then the master plan approval would go on to township supervisors, a process that could take a few months. The township has to approve individual phases of the development project. The total development site is about 57 acres. A Hilton Garden Inn is open on the site.
Henshaw said developers are working on a grading plan for the site, which could include large retaining walls.
The state in January awarded the Butler County Community Development Corp. a $3 million grant for the project.
The planning advisory commission meeting is at 5:30 p.m. at the township building on Rochester Road.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.