Magazine honors Mars woman for her dogged design
A sleek, modern kitchen and a wet, dirty dog do not go well together.
“Our dog goes outside to the back yard in all kinds of weather and can come back covered in snow, water or mud,” Sandy Wahl of Mars said of her dog, Goldie, a collie.
Last year, Wahl decided to do something about the endless mess when she redesigned her kitchen.
She created a designer crate built right into the wall and adjoining cabinets of the kitchen. She got recognition and prize money from a national magazine for designing the crate.
The crate, which is at the end of a counter and next to a sliding glass door, is made of cherry wood. It is about 4 feet long.
“It matches the other cabinets, which looks nicer. Most dog crates are ugly metal or plastic things that look horrible inside of a house,” Wahl said.
Wahl won a $1,000 prize for the crate's design from HGTV magazine, which also ran an article about the device on its website.
HGTV, also known as Home & Garden Television, is a cable television channel that features shows about home improvement, gardening, crafts and home remodeling.
The HGTV magazine is published by the Hearst Corp. in New York.
Attempts to reach magazine officials for comment were not successful.
Wahl doubled the size of her kitchen late last year. She did the design work herself, and her son, Trip O'Bryon of Mars, a carpenter, built the kitchen.
“It worked out well. She had a good idea. Her dog seems to like it too,” said O'Bryon.
Wahl won't become a millionaire from her design, however.
“We had to sign the design rights over (HGTV) when we won the contest,” she said.
Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.