$582K to be held for son accused in Butler County slayings
Three auctions of a slain Butler County couple's belongings, including classic cars and lawn equipment, raised nearly $680,000, court records released on Thursday show.
Minus nearly $100,000 for expenses, $582,000 will be held in a trust until an appeal is finished for Colin Abbott, who pleaded no contest to third-degree murder in February for killing his father and stepmother, Ken and Celeste Abbott, at their Brady estate in June 2011.
Abbott, sentenced to serve 35 to 80 years in prison, wants to withdraw the plea and go to trial.
Judge S. Michael Yeager ruled that until the appeals are exhausted, which attorneys said could take a couple of years, he will not make a decision on an estate request to invoke Pennsylvania's Slayer's Act, which would block Abbott from receiving any estate proceeds.
Abbott's attorney, H. Craig Hinkle, said the ruling is a good move to protect the estate until his appeal before Superior Court is settled.
“What if it's reversed and it's Colin's estate and it's gone?” Hinkle said. “That's the big issue.”
Prosecutors said they believe Abbott wants to withdraw his plea to drum up interest for his mother's effort to secure a book or movie deal.
Deborah Buchanan said she put her quest for a deal on hold because her daughter, Carrie Borges, 44, of Lafayette, N.J., died of pneumonia on June 10. Borges was paralyzed in a 1986 car crash.
Buchanan said her son, imprisoned in Camp Hill, is “very hopeful about the appeal.”
Bill Vidonic is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.